Monday, August 27, 2012

Charlie Crist Endorses Obama

Telling comments from the former Republican Governor of Florida Charlie Crist:

"As America prepares to pick our president for the next four years — and as Florida prepares once again to play a decisive role — I'm confident that President Barack Obama is the right leader for our state and the nation. I applaud and share his vision of a future built by a strong and confident middle class in an economy that gives us the opportunity to reap prosperity through hard work and personal responsibility. It is a vision of the future proven right by our history. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .We often remind ourselves to learn the lessons of the past, lest we risk repeating its mistakes. Yet nearly as often, our short-term memory fails us. Many have already forgotten how deep and daunting our shared crisis was in the winter of 2009, as President Obama was inaugurated. It was no ordinary challenge, and the president served as the nation's calm through a historically turbulent storm. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .We have more work to do, more investments to make and more waste to cut. But only one candidate in this race has proven a willingness to navigate a realistic path to prosperity. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . As Republicans gather in Tampa to nominate Mitt Romney, Americans can expect to hear tales of how President Obama has failed to work with their party or turn the economy around. But an element of their party has pitched so far to the extreme right on issues important to women, immigrants, seniors and students that they've proven incapable of governing for the people. Look no further than the inclusion of the Akin amendment in the Republican Party platform, which bans abortion, even for rape victims. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .The truth is that the party has failed to demonstrate the kind of leadership or seriousness voters deserve.  Pundits looking to reduce something as big as a statewide election to a single photograph have blamed the result of my 2010 campaign for U.S. Senate on my greeting of President Obama. I didn't stand with our president because of what it could mean politically; I did it because uniting to recover from the worst financial crisis of our lifetimes was more important than party affiliation. I stood with our nation's leader because it was right for my state. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . President Obama has a strong record of doing what is best for America and Florida, and he built it by spending more time worrying about what his decisions would mean for the people than for his political fortunes. That's what makes him the right leader for our times, and that's why I'm proud to stand with him today."

You can read the entire op-ed here.  


Sunday, August 26, 2012

This is My Body

They make some good points.  Just saying. 

Saturday, August 25, 2012

POTpourri

AZ Tidbits

Poppycock to Blame President?

This is from 2004, it's interesting that he doesn't use the same line of reasoning with Obama isn't it. 



And about those tax cuts?  How'd that work out?  

Friday, August 24, 2012

Cardinals QB Battle

Kevin Kolb vs John Skelton.  It's looking like a really ugly battle, neither QB has impressed me in the least.  I was hoping, and I'm sure the Cardinals were hoping, that their QB's would be much further along with a full off season and a full training camp to work with but after 4 exhibition games neither has stood out, they almost look like they've regressed from last year (if that's even possible).  There's too much talent on the Cardinals offense for them to be playing this bad (Larry Fitzgerald, Beanie Wells, Ryan Williams, Todd Heap, Michael Floyd, Rob Housler, et al).  The local media seems to think that the Cardinals have to go with John Skelton at this point.  What they are basing that opinion on is beyond me, as again, neither Skelton or Kolb has looked good.  My two cents?  If it was my call, given that neither has emerged as the clear front runner, and given the investment they've made in Kolb, I think they have to give him a legitimate shot in games that actually count, I'd go with him (but with a short leash).

Thursday, August 23, 2012

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

POTpourri

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

Monday, August 20, 2012

War on Women?

The GOP claims there isn't a "War on Women".   I don't think women are buying it, and rightfully so, they still favor Obama over Romney by a wide margin.  Todd Akins recent comments only highlight the GOP's problems.  Perhaps if they GOP wants to win back women voters they should reconsider their stance on a few issues, the Anti-Choice stance is bad enough, it's even worse when they tack on the "even in the case of rape and incest" language (hell, they don't even know what rape is), add in their push for Personhood Acts, their attacks on a woman's access to healthcare, their attacks on Planned Parenthood, their push for vaginal probes, their lack of support for the Lilly Ledbetter Act, it goes on and on.  Hell yes, there is a "War on Women" and it's the GOP waging it.  If you are a woman and you vote Republican, I'm sorry, but you are nuts.  

Sunday, August 19, 2012

More Jon Stewart

He's on a roll lately, I love this take on Cockblocking the Vote.


More here.

POTpourri

Saturday, August 18, 2012

Romney Economic Plan

From what I can garner, and I don't have a lot to go on because he's not letting anyone in on it, there are three main tenants to Mitt Romney's plan to "fix" the economy and unfortunately they sound eerily similar to the George W. Bush plan that sank the economy.   

Tax cuts - i.e. tax cuts to the rich, i.e. trickle down economics, i.e. supply side economics.  Theory being that if you cut taxes on the rich, the rich will reinvest that money back into their companies, they will hire more people, they will start new companies, they will spend more on upgrading their current facilities, they will spend more on research and development and thus the economy will explode with growth.  It's a nice theory, sounds like a reasonable assumption to assume it would work, too bad it doesn't.  If it worked, why are companies and the wealthy sitting on piles of cash right now and not out creating jobs and how would giving them more money change that?  If you look at the history of supply side economics starting with the Reagan years, you'll see that it has essentially accomplished 3 things, 1) increasing income inequality to astounding levels, 2) ballooning the debt and 3) consequently stagnating the economy.  When has it ever worked anyways?  Under Reagan?  That's more myth than reality.  Under George W Bush?  Hardly.  They were touting Ireland for awhile.  Not so much anymore.  Even David Stockman, the architect of the Reagan tax cuts, is now opposed to this idea.  Demand creates jobs, not throwing more money at the rich.  Getting beyond my opposition to supply side economics, the facts are, 1) Romney's number don't add up, and 2) Romney's tax plan would result in a middle class tax hike.  We can do better.

Reduced Spending - We must get the budget deficit under control and NOW claims Romney, otherwise debt will continue to drag down the economy.  While I do agree that the debt needs to be addressed at some point, now is not the time to do it.  You don't believe me?  How about the CBO?  Just check out the success rate of the austerity measures implemented in Europe & Japan, they've failed miserably, all they did was dry up tax revenues and lengthened downturns.  Is that really the prescription we need?  Obama's stimulus on the other hand, was a success (despite claims to the contrary from the GOP).  The problem was we didn't go far enough.  Once the economy sufficiently recovers, tax revenues will increase enough that you can start focusing on cuts.  Another problem I'm having with the Romney debt reduction plan is that it is very light on specifics, he won't say what he will cut to meet his objectives (at the same time he's lowering taxes for the rich, maintaining medicare and increasing defense spending).  He'd have to cut back drastically on virtually every government program and even that wouldn't be enough, in other words, he's living in fantasyland.  The only way to legitimately reduce the budget is through a balanced approach of decreased spending and increased revenues, it's not that hard Mitt. 

Deregulation - Mitt Romney calls regulation a "hidden tax" and states he "will act swiftly to tear down the vast edifice of regulations the Obama administration has imposed on the economy".  Apparently he's already forgotten about the consequences of our last dose of deregulation. The deregulation of Wall Street is the main culprit for the mess we are currently in.  Should we go back further?  How about the S&L scandal?  That was caused by deregulation.  How about the Enron mess?  Yep, you can blame that on deregulation too.  What about environmental degregulation, can we really afford that?  Sure businesses would love it, the Koch brothers would love it (and you know they want something for all that money they are spending on this election), but you have to know that the end result would be increases in such things as air pollution, contaminated ground water, ozone levels and greenhouse gases.  Wouldn't the costs of those things far outweigh any advantages they'd bring in?  Whatever happened to Republicans who cared about the environment anyways?  Teddy Roosevelt is probably rolling over in his grave.

In summary, please think long and hard before giving over the reigns of our economy to Mitt Romney.  

Friday, August 17, 2012

Jon Stewart on Mock Outrage

This is funny, I was just thinking the same thing.  All of the feigned indignation is quite nauseating.

Thursday, August 16, 2012

POTpourri